#TECHNICOLOR CINESTYLE LUT PREMIERE SOFTWARE#

I can also use Nikkons and Canon FDs as well as many others. I've already played with C-mount, M42, Canon EF and Pentax K lenses. The lack of a mirror box and the plentiful lens adapters opens the possibilities up quite a bit. The only thing I would add is that there are actually a TON of lens choices with the Panasonics (maybe more?). Even if articles such as these have made me take Reid with a grain of salt on most issues he is still the authority on all the crazy weirdness of Anamorphic lenses available to the HDSLR and large chip video community. He needs to learn a bit on post production, though I do appreciate his preview of the Cinestyle next to the GH2. These videos just show me that I wouldn't want Andrew to be my colorist since all the 'graded' shots are flatter than the origional raw footage, they lack any contrast or saturation. They totally have sadly turned an otherwise informative website a bit of a joke, it's sad to see someone convince himself that what he bought is the best at the sake of his credibility. There are too many 'DSLRs are still totally important and better then everything' style articles. picture style editor is just not a tool for doing that.I've been following for a while now and I do feel that it's content has slipped over the last 6 months to a year, whenever the AF-100 was announced. What would make sense to me would be to map 0-16383 to 0-255 to have maximum dynamic range(and destoyed midtones, but who cares:P)

but picture stules were supposed to be a part of the 14 to 8 bit convertion proccess. Picture styles seem to be playing around with the resulting 8bit iformation (256 values) after the image is being converted to 8bit from 14bit. but i have not tested if this happens.Īnother explanation could be that they ended up with a picture style that they thought was very good but it looked almost identical to marvels cine style so they did this for their picture style to look different than yours ) The only explanation i could think of is that maybe they found that the video codec could not handle these low values well and lost information in the compression. It is a mystery why technicolor chose to do this. They just dont use 0-16 or 0-17 of the 0-255 available values. Jorgen, what you are saying makes sense, though it is not 10% off at both sides.

Nevertheless, the Marvels Cine Style picture profile for Canon DSLR cameras can be downloaded here: Marvels Film (Martin Beek, and others) have not commented on this and my opinion reflected here is my own and not that of Marvels Film. You can make the Marvels profile as flat as the Technicolor profile by altering it’s curve, dialing the contrast setting further down.

With the Marvels profile 3.4 you use all available digital space.

Warning to all users of the Technicolor Cinema-style flat-profile! Using the Technicolor style will severely limit your dynamic range! Blacks are lifted and whites are limited! With only 255 values between black and white for each color, snooping 10% off at both sides is simple “DR theft”! You remove another 10% of DR when using the Technicolor LUT (via LutBuddy) that’s probably two stops total! It’s curve suspiciously follows our Marvels Cine Style, with the blacks dialed up (limited!) and the whites dialed down (limited too!).

#TECHNICOLOR CINESTYLE LUT PREMIERE SOFTWARE#

I really am a modest guy and you’d hardly hear me bashing other software developers, but this whole Technicolor style is actually sad. The “Marvels Cine Style” profiles i’ve developed the past years are much more advanced, better balanced and actually delivering more dynamic range. I know it might sound childish or even presumptuous, but i feel pretty uncomfortable by this whole Technicolor hype.

Technicolor cinestyle lut premiere